And we are the usual . The government has lived less than two months already Berlusconi proposes and imposes the customary law "ad personam" , tailored to save it from what are euphemistically called its " legal problems." It is a dejavu. But this time the law is so scombicchierata, incoherent, absurd, unreasonable, irrational, blatant, and especially devastating for the entire judicial system and for living together in society that it is hard to believe that two senators have dared to propose it, a government and a Minister of Justice have taken up the , the majority have supported and has been approved by Parliament. Why is a law that has not been seen or in the First nor the Third World and even the next world. Why is not in heaven or on earth .
Therefore, an amendment was added to a decree which takes its name, now more than ever mocking of "security decree, ruling the suspension of all pending litigation involving reati commessi prima del 30 giugno 2002 e che prevedono una pena non superiore ai dieci anni di carcere . Un ulteriore emendamento intima ai magistrati di dare priorità, anche per il presente e il futuro, ai reati che hanno una pena edittale superiore ai dieci anni. La "ratio" di questi emendamenti è di "dare priorità ai reati che destano maggior allarme sociale ". Perché non destano "allarme sociale" le rapine, i sequestri di persona, le estorsioni, gli stupri, le violenze sessuali, la bancarotta fraudolenta, la concussione, la corruzione, la corruzione di magistrati che non sono che una parte di quelli che rientrano nella norma che prevede la sospensione dei rispettivi processi e per alcuni dei quali la same majority that does not invoke the "zero tolerance"? It does not raise "social alarm" that a President of the Council was able bribe a witness in two distinct processes, by paying $ 600,000 for lying , is exactly the offense for which Mr Berlusconi is on trial before the Court of Milan and that falls naturally among those who will be suspended (crime attributed to the prime minister is, incidentally, February 2001), and which was organized this incredible baradan? Not to mention that this expands the already long time in all of Italian justice, in words, complain, and who are the real cancer . And not even to consider that these rules violate unheard of at least three fundamental principles of our legal system, guaranteed by the Constitution: equality of all citizens before the law, the independence of the Judiciary, the mandatory prosecution . It claims that it will, for the present and the future, the robbers, rapists, the thieves, the thieves apartment, the bankrupts, the extortioner, do mischief?
An entire legal system is to pro disrupted by a single person . Such rules would have triggered a revolution not say in any country and western liberal, but in Burundi, Burkina Faso, in Benin. But we are going to go quietly except for a few ammoina opposition, whose leader, Walter Veltroni, said that "the canvas was torn dialogue . Here what has been torn, rather how it is law that concerns the whole community and not the relationship with the opposition that we could even give a damn. As the issue is not the clash between the Executive and Judiciary. It concerns us all.
What to do? Perhaps it would be better to listen to a modest suggestion that allowed me to give the time of Rome (which is not exactly a left-wing daily) in the mid-'90s, when Berlusconi began its devastating campaign against the Italian judiciary. That is, introduce a rule very special, along the lines of "Transitional and final provisions" that are in line with our Constitution, and acting, more or less like this: " Silvio Berlusconi, his descendants, his spouses, their relatives and all members, for any reason, the House of Arcore were exempt, in the past, present and future, from the respect of the criminal laws . We would have at least spared the carnage of recent days.
Massimo Fini by ll Gazzettino June 20, 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment